Authored by: sd_ip_tech on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 04:26 PM EDT |
If I understand that correctly. That may be an actionable item IF one believes
they hold the JAVA brand.
---
sd_ip_tech[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 04:58 PM EDT |
The JavaME is so brutually different from JavaSE and Android, that I do not see
how this would apply.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 06:15 PM EDT |
no text [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 07:10 PM EDT |
All from Oracle, by pressing this ridiculous
lawsuit. I will no longer consider use of Java for any
personal or company projects, and the company will
no longer take on any Java projects unless the customer
agrees in a written contract to indemnify us against
any lawsuits from Oracle.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: darrellb on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 07:44 PM EDT |
Oracle presented overwhelming evidence at trial that Google knew it
would fragment and damage Java. Too bad Oracle didn't sue over
Java. Doh! [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|