|
Authored by: pem on Sunday, May 27 2012 @ 03:02 PM EDT |
After all, there is nothing in the record that shows that Oracle asked Google
for $240.
No, the record shows that Oracle asked for lots more (profit, injunction, etc.)
That's frivolous litigation.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Wol on Sunday, May 27 2012 @ 06:09 PM EDT |
They wouldn't have a snowball in hell's chance of avoiding it over here.
The only thing Oracle have actually won on in court is that little thing where
Google said "mea culpa". In a UK court that would probably land them
straight into major damage limitation mode in an attempt to avoid a ruling for
costs (in American terms, that would be "paying attorney fees and
expenses").
That's why we don't have that sort of litigation over here, the prospect of
being landed with ALL the costs of the case prompts a very strong desire for a
reasonable settlement.
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- I think - Authored by: pem on Tuesday, May 29 2012 @ 12:20 PM EDT
- I think - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 29 2012 @ 04:51 PM EDT
|
|
|
|