decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
What is the next show? | 393 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
05/24/2012 - 1198 - TRIAL BRIEF # 2 Exhibit B
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 25 2012 @ 03:49 PM EDT
05/24/2012 - 1198 - TRIAL BRIEF # 2 Exhibit B) (Van Nest,
Robert)

Reading from last paragraph of page 22 to page 23;

Moreover, in Europe, the right to create compatible products
through reverse engineering is protected by statute.
European Software Directive, Articles 5 and 6. If the
district court's decision is affirmed, Sony and other
hardware manufacturers will gain absolute control
over access to their computers and operating systems, and
software companies in the United States will be precluded

by copyright law from producing interoperable software.
European companies and companies around the world will not
be similarly restricted, to the detriment of American
industry, workers and consumers.

-- What is your interpretation of the above chapter? My
interpretation is -- Oracle is in -- for a lot of hurt
according to there brief.

- Clive.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What is the next show?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 26 2012 @ 07:15 AM EDT
with patents like this one:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.ht
ml&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=20110274409.PGNR.

we can rest assured that we will have enough court fun in the
next months...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )