|
Authored by: Kilz on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 01:23 PM EDT |
> We don't need to get everyone to agree. We need to get one
> judge and jury to understand the facts of technology and
> issue a ruling accordingly. Then we need to convince the
> Supreme Court are uphold the ruling. If we can convince
> the Federal Circuit as well it is even better but this one
> is a long shot.
How come we havent had this happen already? Could it be that
the people involved in the cases so far have had no desire
to have software patents stopped because both sides have
lots and lots of them? How are we going to get the idea in
front of a jury if the only people who can afford to go to
trial over patents have them themselves and want to keep
software patents alive?
Should we simply wait around for it to happen while
thousands of software patents are added every day? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|