Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 06:56 PM EDT |
Just think of all the copyright violations that would be generated if someone
ever left such a program running. Maybe something for BOINC or that room full
of monkeys to get to work on.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 04:20 AM EDT |
Please, find a self-consistent viewpoint that holds that software is not just
maths, that also conforms to all known physical results.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jjs on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 06:17 AM EDT |
so why is software? Why is software covered by BOTH patent
and copyright?
---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 09:45 AM EDT |
Likewise, software isn't patentable, it's copyrightable.
Thanks for making the point for us. :-)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|