The one where I outline how I hope to ultimately show why software should not
be patent eligible material. the one with the subject:
Conclusion:
Software should not be patentable subject matter!
The one you
responded to (I'm assuming your the same anon) was strictly within the context
of a basic calculator and the use thereof.
It was obviously not
your intent to speak strictly within the context of the calculator as is quite
clear when you state:
So to debunk software patents, you must
apply
Caveat: It is only polite to wait till someone has finished
speaking on a particular subject before attempting to speak relative to the
points the person is trying to make. The conversational flow should be quite
obvious that the previous response was premature and that the response to which
this post responds didn't bother to understand the context before
replying.
I won't reply to any more along these lines until I've
finished. Thank you!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|