Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 04:06 PM EDT |
Which is why the stipulation has a special clause that the $0
amount is intended to evaporate on appeal and should not be
compared to the statutory minimum of $200 for innocent
infringement of RangeCheck plus $500 for willful but limited
distribution infringement of 7 other files. Or maybe that is
$200 + 7 x $500 = $3700.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 04:44 PM EDT |
They were robbed. They should have been awarded 2ยข. ;-)
---
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is
advised.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Can't wait - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 07:04 PM EDT
- Can't wait - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 22 2012 @ 09:40 AM EDT
|
Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 06:57 PM EDT |
We never did get to hear the amount of that one, but as it never showed in the
SCO financials, I think it was probably of similar magnitude.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|