decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Liberty - to be treated at public expense | 355 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Liberty
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 02 2012 @ 12:38 PM EDT
And now a hermit has to pay a tax so that hospitals-- bound by ethics and by law to treat him when he inevitably falls ill -- and insurance companies don't go broke.
T,FTFY ;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Liberty - to be treated at public expense
Authored by: jjs on Monday, July 02 2012 @ 09:50 PM EDT
So if the hermit gets sick and is treated, who pays? Is it
right for someone to get treatment without paying for it? Is
it right for someone to knowingly forgo contributing to
healthcare when they are young, counting on someone else
paying (and thus keeping the insurance rates down) when they
are older and need care?

Note that the tax is paid only by those who refuse to pay for
insurance, thus potentially burdening the public with the
cost of their care.

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )