decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Don't forget Karel De Gucht | 474 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Don't forget Karel De Gucht
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 04 2012 @ 02:31 PM EDT
"Personally I hope they strip this guy of all credentials and ship him out.
Preferably to some 3rd world dictatorship more in tune with his thinking."

What US airport would you suggest as his destination?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Don't forget Karel De Gucht
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 03:09 PM EDT
The only thing the Europen cort will decide is if parts of the treaty are
against European law or not. They are not deciding if the treaty becomes
implemented. That is a decisiom to be made by the European parlement and they
just decided not to sign the treaty.
The expectation is that if the treaty is not against European law that De Gucht
will make a second try, with or without modifications of the treaty. If parts
are against European law then the treaty has to be rewritten before it can
become valid in Europe. In all cases that the treaty has to be modified, a new
signing has to be initiated in all countries that already approved the treaty,
probably again with voting in the parlements of those countries.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Don't forget Karel De Gucht
Authored by: esni on Friday, July 06 2012 @ 01:43 PM EDT
I think the European Paliament voted against as a reaction to ACTA being
negotiated in the very clandestine way it was.

So the fight against ACTA became a fight fro greater EP power

---
Eskild
Denmark


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )