|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, July 14 2012 @ 12:37 PM EDT |
If I read Oracle's footnote to their
motion correctly, that's exactly what they said they were
doing:Oracle recognizes granting JMOL on some of the copyright
issues would require the Court to overturn all or part of its order on
copyrightability. Nonetheless, Oracle brings this motion to preserve its rights
on appeal, particularly since the Court structured the trial to accommodate the
possibility of the jury verdict being reinstated on appeal. See ECF No. 1202 at
2. Although not required to do so, Oracle also moves for JMOL on
copyrightability out of an abundance of caution. See Section IE.1, infra.
Also note Judge Alsup's reaction when he was told that Oracle would
be submitting it: Judge: You gotta do what you gotta do. Thank you
for the heads-up. That was mirrorslap's
reporting of a case management hearing.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|