|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:29 AM EDT |
So they can be fixed
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:30 AM EDT |
Please make links clickable
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011 - Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 12:59 PM EDT
- Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011 - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:30 PM EDT
- Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011 - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:38 PM EDT
- griping - Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 02:21 PM EDT
- griping - Authored by: luvr on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 02:36 PM EDT
- griping - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT
- griping - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:25 PM EDT
- griping - Authored by: micheas on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 09:42 PM EDT
- Was demonstrated - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT
- Was demonstrated - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:51 PM EDT
- Win95 - Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 05:12 PM EDT
- Win95 - Authored by: rcsteiner on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 05:25 PM EDT
- What? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:34 PM EDT
- Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011 - Authored by: luvr on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 02:28 PM EDT
- Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011 - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT
- ‘Severe consequences’ for Microsoft’s browser screwup - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:10 PM EDT
- Law Firm Rankings 2013 - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:42 PM EDT
- Potential News Picks ? - Authored by: luvr on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 03:46 PM EDT
- UW joins Stanford, others; will offer free online classes - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 03:54 PM EDT
- Firefox 14 Encrypts Google Searches - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:36 PM EDT
- looks like Apple managed to patent the scroll bar - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 07:01 PM EDT
- Paul Maritz replaced as VMware CEO. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 12:56 AM EDT
- Anti-piracy Group Fined For Using Song Without Permission - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:47 AM EDT
|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:31 AM EDT |
Please make links clickable
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:32 AM EDT |
Thank you for your support
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: arnt on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 11:49 AM EDT |
..that's patently wrong. Justice is all we need.
..and, we would get that by proper legislation,
by proper compliance to the laws,
by proper application of the laws and
by proper enforcement of the laws.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:33 PM EDT |
Hi,
The link the bitly refers me to is:
https://sites.google.com/site/patentlitsurvey/
But there seems to be no survey, link to any survey, or instructions as to how
to take the survey. Just the page which pj has quoted.
Regards,
Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com>
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: sk43 on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 08:54 PM EDT |
Many years ago one software project I worked on was hit with a trademark cease
and desist demand - the informal name for one of our programs (used only
internally) was also a company's name. The search engines somehow decided that
we were still more interesting than the commercial company. Our lawyers
examined the situation ... and immediately waved the white flag. Spent two
weeks renaming everything.
I also think the place I work was sent one of SCO's threatening letters - in any
case, I was told that SCO had sued IBM for copyright infringement (not actually
true at the time) and I was to track all Linux usage until 6 months after the
lawsuit was resolved. That was over 9 years ago, and I'm still tracking,
reading GL every day from work to determine when the 6 month timer starts.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:45 AM EDT |
Hearing Information
Hearing on: "The International Trade Commission and Patent Disputes"
Wednesday 7/18/2012 - 10:00 a.m.
2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet
By Direction of the Chairman
Hearing Documentation
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/Hearings%202012/hear_07182012.html
Here's the subcomittee information. See if you can find YOUR representative:
The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet shall
have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: copyright, patent,
trademark law, information technology, antitrust matters, other appropriate
matters as referred by the Chairman, and relevant oversight.
112th Congress Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the
Internet
B-352 R.H.O.B.
Tel: 225-5741
Mr. Goodlatte, Chairman
Mr. Quayle, Vice Chairman ((R) Arizona, 3rd)
Mr. Sensenbrenner ((R) Wisconsin, 5th)
Mr. Watt ((D) North Carolina, 12th)
Mr. Coble ((R) North Carolina, 6th)
Mr. Conyers (Ranking Member(D) Michigan, 14th)
Mr. Chabot ((R) Ohio, 1st)
Mr. Berman ((D) California, 28th)
Mr. Issa ((R) California, 49th)
Ms. Chu ((D) California, 32nd)
Mr. Pence ((R) Indiana, 6th)
Mr. Deutch ((D) Florida, 19th)
Mr. Jordan ((R) Ohio, 4th)
Ms. Sánchez ((D) California, 39th)
Mr. Poe ((R) Texas, 2nd)
Mr. Nadler ((D) New York, 8th)
Mr. Chaffetz ((R) Utah, 3rd)
Ms. Lofgren ((D) California, 16th)
Mr. Griffin ((R) Arkansas, 2nd)
Ms. Jackson Lee ((D) Texas, 18th)
Mr. Marino ((R) Pennsylvania, 10th)
Ms. Waters ((D) California, 35th)
Ms. Adams ((R) Florida, 24th)
Mr. Johnson ((D) Georgia, 4th)
Mr. Amodei ((R) Nevada, 2nd)
bkd[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 10:42 AM EDT |
If you let respondents self select, wont you get responses mostly from angry,
motivated people and get no responses from people who have not been adversely
effected?
Seems like a very poor way to do a survey to me. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|