|
Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 03:23 PM EDT |
This is not technical incompetence. This is a failure of the audit process.
When a company must comply with legal requirements like this, they have to put
an auditor in charge make sure there are no slip up. If a technical problem
occurs, the auditor would catch it before the product is shipped. Also the
reports Microsoft sent to the Commission must have been verified for correctness
before they are sent. Sending reports without verifying their accuracy is a
serious negligence at least.
So whether or not there was a technical error is unimportant. The real question
is whether Microsoft had a compliance auditor, whether he did his job and what
the executives at Microsoft did with his reports if any.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: albert on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt here. This is not a
security issue no one knows about, nor is it bug that shows up once in a blue
moon.
The leopard is genetically incapable of changing its spots, even if hairless.
Incompetence isn't a defence. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- intent - Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:33 PM EDT
|
|
|
|