Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:49 PM EDT |
Stand up, dude(tte, if applicable), support your own claims. A few
links from YOUR Google search would be very helpful and perhaps even
convincing.
If you simply search for "judge overrules jury" you
will get nearly 1 million hits. I am not going to sort through them for
you.
As to your second point, here's a quote from PJ right at the
start of this very thread (emphasis mine):
on a JMOL motion,
the judge is not supposed to weigh the testimony of witnesses, a role that is
given to juries, unless there is 1*no* way any reasonable jury could find for a
party. Yet, here, that is precisely what the judge
does
Yes, well, P.J. apparently misread something. See
the "I don't think Judge Motz said that" root-level comment. Even if she had
been correct in that instance, Judge Motz decided that point in Novell's favor,
for what that's worth. In any case, P.J. didn't say anything that contradicted
what I said.
Finally, if you were not calling Groklavians'
respective reactions to judges Alsup and Motz hypocritical, what were you
doing? I was calling a certain action hypocritical. If the shoe
fits, wear it. If it doesn't, don't worry about it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|