decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You are not paying me to be your teacher | 185 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You are not paying me to be your teacher
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:49 PM EDT
Stand up, dude(tte, if applicable), support your own claims. A few links from YOUR Google search would be very helpful and perhaps even convincing.
If you simply search for "judge overrules jury" you will get nearly 1 million hits. I am not going to sort through them for you.
As to your second point, here's a quote from PJ right at the start of this very thread (emphasis mine):
on a JMOL motion, the judge is not supposed to weigh the testimony of witnesses, a role that is given to juries, unless there is 1*no* way any reasonable jury could find for a party. Yet, here, that is precisely what the judge does
Yes, well, P.J. apparently misread something. See the "I don't think Judge Motz said that" root-level comment. Even if she had been correct in that instance, Judge Motz decided that point in Novell's favor, for what that's worth. In any case, P.J. didn't say anything that contradicted what I said.
Finally, if you were not calling Groklavians' respective reactions to judges Alsup and Motz hypocritical, what were you doing?
I was calling a certain action hypocritical. If the shoe fits, wear it. If it doesn't, don't worry about it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )