|
Authored by: FreeChief on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 09:57 AM EDT |
To clarify: now that the article is done and posted I have no edits to suggest.
In particular, I am not saying that it should be removed now. It's done;
checking it for errors is more work than I want to do. It's just sad that PJ
feels she needs to spend her time and talent proving that drivel is
drivel.
It's done now and I am in awe of thoroughness of it. If anyone
still thinks that whats-his-name is a source of anything but drivel here is the
proof. QED suckers. I hope they read it.
There is no need to write more on
that subject, PJ, the proof is complete.
— Programmer in
Chief
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- stet - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT
- stet - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 12:27 PM EDT
- Brava (n/t) - Authored by: myNym on Friday, July 27 2012 @ 05:11 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 26 2012 @ 08:06 PM EDT |
Need to be written as they make a concise record of how the perp was wrong, and
proved wrong.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|