Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 05:52 PM EDT |
I think you missed the question.
Ah, there was no court order. That's because the constitution of the U.S. frowns
on prior restraint of free speech.
And yes, if I tell the truth about you in public, you might not like it a bit.
That doesn't give you any rights--except to take all the umbrage you can carry.
Tough. Get over it.
Apple's name is mud. And few companies recover from that. Remember Sony? Sort of
like the Apple of the last generation, except with more products and better
engineering. Look at them now....[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Wol on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 05:54 PM EDT |
As far as I am aware, Samsung did NOT release ANY documents.
They merely pointed out to the journalists where to find those documents, in
full public view, in the court record.
Oh - and such pointing was in RESPONSE to journalist questions, not proactive.
My oh my, the FUDsters (AC's I notice :-) seem to be out in force today!
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: nsomos on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 06:46 PM EDT |
The truth must cost you too much, otherwise why would
you be so economical with your use of it?
If what you claim were true, why did the Judge rule
against the sanctions that Apple called for?
Also you STILL have not identified the court order that
you claim Samsungs lawyer violated.
But don't worry about me ... I won't hold my breath waiting.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 09:00 AM EDT |
These "private internal Apple documents" that you refer to were
already public information,in that they were filed as parts of, or exhibits to,
various motions related to this case, and they were not filed under seal, so
they were already public information and some news sources had already published
them, so they were no longer "private internal Apple documents".[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cjk fossman on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT |
Samsung abused its discovery
privileges
Um,
discovery is right, not a privilege.
by ... trying to confuse and
stir up the public
How dastardly. Confusing people with facts
is a dirty
trick indeed.
by publishing those documents, and their
favorite
(and unopposed) interpretation of them.
And Apple has
been soo quiet. I guess they must have
pulled the plug on their publicity
machine. (not) [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|