|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 08:49 AM EDT |
I wouldn't take the numbers too seriously - those aren't exactly based on hard
data. Anyone who actually does know how much money is changing hands is tied up
by the ridiculous NDAs - people are making up numbers then then next
"analyst" uses that as a source for the next report.
Of course getting outraged at the patent "quality" here is reasonable
enough.
Agree that the FAT patents are ridiculous, but what does activesync have to do
with windows? There's alternatives to interact with exchange (eg IMAP). You're
choosing to use a MS protocol here, you're not forced to.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 09:22 AM EDT |
Wasn't this already brought up on GrokLaw?
ISTR Barnes & Noble standing up to M$'s "NDA" process to hide
the desired high license fees for trivial S/W patents.
But, then, Apple has specialized in "Look & Feel" suits
themselves...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|