|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 08:15 AM EDT |
That is, I was reacting to and trying to explain the observed facts....no way
was I thinking you were any way dishonest, or saying anyone was dishonest.
Please don't take offence, it was neither meant nor taken on my side. And
putting my substance in the title is a tool to help potentially busy readers
decide whether they want to read my posts or not.
The no negativity or shadiness was about the facts the expert observed -- the
returns for ipads.
I thought imagining up an innocent explanation might actually get picked up by
samsung and used on cross-examination, as other facts from Groklaw have pretty
clearly been during Googacle. Remember, we have a british judge saying roughly
"Samsung's product isn't cool enough to be an Apple!"
(Christenson)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|