|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 04:01 PM EDT |
Link
Fidler said in a
written declaration he started working on a tablet design in 1981 and that
“Apple personnel were exposed to my tablet ideas and prototypes” during a period
in the mid-1990s when the company collaborated with Knight-Ridder Inc.’s
information design laboratory in Colorado.
But what is
interesting is that Apple again tried to keep
Samsung from making their
case.
In a session without the jury present, Samsung lawyer
Charles Verhoeven, defending the company’s attempt to show the testimony, told
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh it was central to the company’s case and that Apple
had successfully blocked Fidler from testifying in person. He didn’t explain how
or why. The jury didn’t see any videotape recording of Apple’s lawyers
questioning Fidler.
I wonder how Apple kept the witness from
being in court.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 01:48 AM EDT |
Sorry I originally posted in "Very Short Primer" article. reposting here as
it is up to date. Dotcom was in court again today trying to get funds and
cars released (9 to be sold) so that he can pay NZ$2.7M bill RadioNZ . Judge not impressed asks for details of lawyers
charges. Court has issued reserved decision that US FBI must give Mr
Dotcom evidence that will be used against him in extradition hearing. Judge says
would be significantly constrained in his ability to participate in
the hearing
RadioNZ [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|