decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Of Course | 201 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Of Course
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 10:11 AM EDT

Which is exactly why I said:

Whether or not that brief will be even glanced at is another question.
I did speak very broadly. Giving a single example of what the plaintiff/defendant would want to prove for their respective side of the cases that spoke directly to the concern the OP (original post) raised. That, of course, does not mean they don't have other things to prove such as (and only a small part of the whole picture) the plaintiff proving their patents were infringed, while the defendant would want to prove the patents aren't even valid.

As a result, I am curious what P.J. read into what I authored that she found so wrong.

So I wait patiently till she gets back to what little I wrote :)

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

To be clear from my perspective
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 12:10 PM EDT

If the OP wants a more detailed question answered then:

    Is there a way?
With a general answer of:
    Yes - here's an example that may or may not work for you given your particular situation!
then my best humble, non-legal answer is:
    First, you should speak to a good general Lawyer to examine the situation and identify all the areas of Law that the situation touches on.
    Second, you should find a good Lawyer with both knowledge and experience in the areas of Law that your situation requires.
    Third, in my very very humble opinion, you should keep in mind what you hope to gain out of the Lawsuit/Filings relative to what you're going to spend on the Lawsuit/Filings, what you're likely to gain, what you could loose, what the principle (is it a fight against slavery?) is, and whether or not all those factors added together means you should even begin to fight the battle or pick another battle another day.
That's my "more detailed" response to "more detailed" points on the subject :)

You know... in that last part of the sentence

whether you should even begin to fight the battle or pick another battle another day
there's some wisdom in there somewhere. Maybe someday I'll get wise enough to recognize it.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )