|
Authored by: mrisch on Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:35 PM EDT |
no way [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 04:05 PM EDT |
But what is interesting in the context.
Here is the 4 comments in chrono
order:
Intel lawyer now in front of Judge Koh, raising worries that
Samsung expert witness Tim Williams has improperly disclosed Intel source code.
Williams called on the carpet.
Whatever he's getting paid, Williams probably
thinking it's not enough right now. Koh grilling him for violating
non-disclosure agreements.
Judge Koh not letting Williams testify for now
until she sorts out the law on experts who have conflict of interest by
improperly revealing competitor source code. Samsung atty says Intel very close
to Apple in this case, suggests this is an ambush.
"I want to see papers, I
don't trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom," Koh demands. Right now,
the case is Intel and Apple v. Samsung.
Seems to me Judge Koh
took the word of the Intel lawyer
at face value. I agree with the Samsung
lawyer that it
is an ambush. What source code from Intel would have
any bearing
on this case? Seems that if Intel has a beef
with this person, they should take
it up in a separate case.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|