decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Judge Asks Google to Supplement Its List of Any Paid Folks ~pj | 79 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Judge Asks Google to Supplement Its List of Any Paid Folks ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 02:46 PM EDT
So I guess the way Google needs to handle this is to mass
email everyone on their payables/salary/etc. lists and ask
them "Have you commented in any of the following ways on
anything remotely concerning Apple v. Google?" And hope that
they self-report properly.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Asks Google to Supplement Its List of Any Paid Folks ~pj
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 04:35 PM EDT
But if that is the question the Judge asked, then Google pretty much has to
answer "We don't know". THAT is the big problem. The Judge is trying
to uncover underhanded connections. Google has so many "suspicious"
connections that it's going to be the devil's own job to separate the needles
from the haystack.

That is Google's problem, and it sounds like they might have difficulty getting
the Judge to buy it.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )