decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Example set in courtroom | 151 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Example set in courtroom
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 05:30 PM EDT
I blame the judge for letting so much into the case, that it not only overwork
the jury, but also end up muddling and confusing the facts till there's probably
no fair way to figuring out what's true and what's false.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Example set in courtroom
Authored by: Charles888 on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 05:39 PM EDT
This judge did such a miserable job. For her, process
outweighed getting to the truth.
In these technically challenging cases, the judge's primary
task (beside ruling on matters of law) is to ensure enough
context is provided so a jury can make sense of issues well
above their heads. They must ensure that the opposing
lawyers do not take advantage of the system by using legal
maneuvers to obfuscate the facts of the case. It is hard
enough for the jury even without that.
This did not happen here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )