Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 07:22 PM EDT |
Samsung got eviscerated by the jury here, but it isn't game over. Even assuming
this stands a couple of UI tweaks (apparently worth a billion dollars) diappear,
Samsung pays it's extortion money and go back to business as usual again.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 07:23 PM EDT |
What is the difference between and iPhone and a Palm Pilot?
Google (nee Motorola)'s patent portfolio.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: N_au on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 07:45 PM EDT |
Only in the usa and for anyone stupid enough to follow them. eg Australia via
free trade agreement.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: lunarship on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 08:32 PM EDT |
It's all about Samsung, as far as I can tell. Basically they went after
Samsung's changes to Android, and the look of the devices. Nothing about Android
per se as far as I could tell (I may, of course, be wrong - such a thing has
been known).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:01 AM EDT |
Remember Apple's 1984 ad? Now they are the villain. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|