|
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:41 PM EDT |
I detect a pattern. You are in Washington State,
where Microsoft is located. Duh. Go away. Your
comment is too silly for Groklaw.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 01:12 AM EDT |
And if it turned out that Google was in the wrong, do you
seriously think that the EFF would have stood silent?
You're right that companies give money to non-profits to
"continue what they're doing", but you're wrong in thinking
that it means that they'll only continue it selectively.
Look at it like this:
If company A provides my non-profit with 20% of its income,
and I have the option of writing something that the other
80% of my income will oppose or not, I'm not going to bend
over for Company A. Otherwise, there's a really good chance
that company A will be providing 100% of my income, and they
won't have increased their amount at all (in OTHER WORDS, I
will lose 80% of my income).
Have a great day:)
Patrick.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|