|
Authored by: Tkilgore on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 04:36 PM EDT |
> Glad to read you now think we dont need EULA's PJ.
When exactly did PJ say that we "need" EULAs? I am sure that inquiring
minds would like to know.
Or is it that she said EULAs have the law behind them whether anyone likes that
state of affairs, or not?
The second statement is very different from the first, even though some people
seem able to confuse the two.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- EULA's ??? - Authored by: Kilz on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 06:17 PM EDT
|
Authored by: cybervegan on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 05:53 PM EDT |
As far as I know, PJ has always been against abusive EULA's (I'm assuming that
there is the possibility of a non-abusive EULA).
---
Software source code is a bit like underwear - you only want to show it off in
public if it's clean and tidy. Refusal could be due to embarrassment or shame...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- EULA's - Authored by: Kilz on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 06:24 PM EDT
- EULA's - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 10:22 PM EDT
- EULA's - Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 01:00 AM EDT
|
|
|
|