|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 09:18 PM EDT |
As far as an appeal is concerned, it's my understanding that this evidence would
be inadmissible, as it did not exist at the time the jury rendered its verdict.
On the other hand, questioning the jury, as mentioned in the second response to
the root comment, would, surely, be very much in order.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Correction - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 09:21 PM EDT
- Does what he says matter? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 02:41 AM EDT
|
Authored by: soronlin on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 08:59 AM EDT |
> the jury, may be questioned about what was said, thought
> and done in reaching this patently absurd verdict.
A minor point: The one thing you cannot ask is what they were thinking. That is
inadmissible. You can ask what was done, and whether one of their number
introduced evidence of his own (or whatever).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: red floyd on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT |
{
patently absurd verdict
}
I see what you did there.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|