|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 08:31 PM EDT |
The problem seems to be that, as foreman, he was able to sway the others,
probably on the basis that they could get home early if they just did as he
said.
He owns a patent, his judgement was affected by what he wants for his patent:
* it to be not invalidated by any prior art
* it to be used against anything vaguely similar
* it to get a judgement for a $billion
Perhaps he thinks that he will be getting the billion from Samsung now.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 08:48 PM EDT
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 08:53 PM EDT
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 09:30 PM EDT
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: Torinir on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 12:06 AM EDT
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: newbury on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 01:31 PM EDT
- Then the thing to do in this case... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:53 AM EDT
- Lots around - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 08:53 AM EDT
- One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. - Authored by: Alan(UK) on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 01:59 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 10:25 PM EDT |
That even if all the other jurors would have
disagreed this guy would have hung the jury.
That may have been the best we could have
hoped for? Dunno, maybe an appeal will give
us a better result. Pray to the court.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 01:10 PM EDT |
It's hard to know what you would consider to be fascinating (that's a rather
personal thing), but I wouldn't have said what you did. Firstly, it's not clear
that the appeal that you expect will even be necessary. I haven't been following
this all that closely, but it's not too late for the judge to order a retrial,
is it? In that case, Apple might appeal, but Samsung wouldn't. (Perhaps Apple
and Samsung might both appeal parts that they wouldn't be happy with.) The other
thing is that I am not fascinated by things that seem fairly obvious. To me, it
would be clear that Samsung should win. No doubt the lawyers would add tons of
complexity, but to me it would be unnecessary complexity, so it wouldn't be that
fascinating. That's probably just a matter of personal preference, though. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|