|
Authored by: stegu on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 01:08 PM EDT |
This request for amendment by Apple in their
second lawsuit against Samsung was actually
covered in a regular article. Look a few
articles back and you will see it.
It was mentioned that the S3 sold out in several
retail chains because people in the US realized
that 1) the S3 is probably a good phone if Apple
wants it banned, and 2) it might not be available
in the US for much longer, so they'd better hurry
if they want one.
People spoke of a self-inflicted wound for Apple,
and I think that is a fitting description.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 03:49 PM EDT |
The motion is based on two *utility* patents, not design patents, ruled to be
infringed. It has nothing to do with how the S3 *looks*.
At least get your facts straight.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|