|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 10:34 PM EDT |
...because a reasonable remedy is for them to notify ALL of their customers
with an offer for ALL of their source code. It will be a bad case of eating
crow!
Also, part of discovery will now involve inspection of ALL of Twin Peaks
source code.
And, if, as RH asks for, an injunction might easily prevent them from
shipping ANY software at all. That would completely destroy the business.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, September 15 2012 @ 04:12 AM EDT |
Although PolR has often explained why this should be true and has also explained
how the Supreme Court has limited pure software patents, the District court has
often ignored their direction. They have considered that software is patentable
as a basic premise.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|