|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 04:19 AM EDT |
#1988 is a motion (JMOL) requesting the court declare the Apple patents in suit
invalid, as:
1) The design patents are indefinite (How's a designer supposed to know the
boundaries of the claims?)
2) The utility patents are obvious, as all elements of claims publicised
earlier.
3) No actual notice to Samsung, so willfulness cannot be proven.
And it is the court's, not the jury's, duty to determine validity, though the
court may ask for the jury's decision.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 04:43 AM EDT |
Therefore, no damages on patent infringement.
Never mind, I'll bet that's standard practice, as I don't hear ETSI
screaming...never mind, I'll bet that's Apple practice with ETSI too....
And they call asking for 2.25% on the first negotiating call not reasonable...in
spite of public info elsewhere that that is not out of line.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|