|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 08:15 AM EDT |
The PDF shows the questions and answers clearly enough:
PROSPECTIVE JUROR: AS I HAD STATED EARLIER, THAT WAS -- IN 2008, THAT WAS THE
ACCUSATION AGAINST ME BEFORE THE PATENT WAS ISSUED.
THE COURT: NOW, WHEN THE PROGRAMMER SUED YOU, WAS THAT PROGRAMMER ALSO A
CO-INVENTOR ON THE PATENT?
PROSPECTIVE JUROR: NO.
THE COURT: NO. I SEE.
PROSPECTIVE JUROR: THE PATENT WAS ISSUED TOTALLY -- EXCLUSIVELY IN MY NAME.
THE COURT: I SEE.
PROSPECTIVE JUROR: AND I HAD FILED FOR THAT PATENT PRIOR TO HIS JOINING THE
EFFORT TO WORK FOR IT. THAT WAS PART OF MY DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT IT WAS
MINE.
THE COURT: OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET ME ASK, IF YOU HAVE STRONG FEELINGS OR STRONG
OPINIONS ABOUT EITHER THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LAWS, WOULD YOU RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|