|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2012 @ 12:50 PM EDT |
Aren't you defending a sick case.
A imperfect health care system cannot be fixed by a lawsuit.
Have you any reference cases about scolding by coffee outside the USA?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2012 @ 03:30 PM EDT |
The trouble is thru' all the measuring of degrees of burn and percentage
of skin area and sticking thermometers in cups from Kalamazoo to
Cotopaxi, there doesn't seem to have been any serious look at the
container. The contents were alleged to be a dangerous liquid.
The container, including its lid and fastening, were not engineered to
be safe in the hands of persons unskilled in handling such liquids.
In the McDonalds case the plaintiff initially did not pursue the rapacious
sue first ask later mentality that I (OP) lamented at the top of this thread.
The plaintiff sought simply to recover their costs. McDonalds in a
defensive rage did not seem concerned to do anything from their
part to prevent future occurences. At least not till nearly twenty years
later, and it seems to be fashion driving the change, not public safety.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/03/27/mcdonalds-coffee-cups-getting-a-
modern-makeover/[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|