Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 08:58 AM EDT |
He said "once" which is a lie. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cjk fossman on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 11:49 AM EDT |
He withheld material information. That's a form of lying. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT |
"Once" was the truth but it was not the whole truth. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 03:18 AM EDT |
What we don't know from the transcript was whether there was a pause after his
first statement that would have allowed him to continue or that the judge jumped
straight in with questions about the case.
I suspect there was a pause long enough for him to go on and declare other
cases, and when he didn't immediately continue with earlier cases, the judge
started asking questions.
The fact that he's now making up a time cut-off for previous cases indicates to
me that it was a deliberate effort on his part not to volunteer any information
on that score, despite being asked for all cases....
YellowShed[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: miltonw on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 11:37 AM EDT |
It is made very, very clear to potential jurors that they are required to
disclose any and all connections and experiences that might bear on the current
case and might affect the potential juror's ability to be
unbiased.
Even if the potential juror is asked no questions at
all, it is still their legal duty to disclose any and all such
connections and experiences. Period. This isn't a game of "twenty questions",
this is ensuring a fair trial.
Saying Hogan "wasn't asked" is a
distraction and an invalid excuse for his failures. The responsibility
to disclose was, ultimately, his.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 07:58 PM EDT |
The missing lawsuit is irrelevant. He also stated *UNDER OATH* that he would
not use his own interpretation of the law, but that he would use the Judge's.
His own statements, post-trial, show that he lied about this during VD.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|