|
Authored by: kawabago on Tuesday, October 09 2012 @ 03:25 PM EDT |
How about starting here: Anything that starts with digital
information and returns digital information as a result, is
not patent eligible subject matter.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tiger99 on Tuesday, October 09 2012 @ 06:49 PM EDT |
As far as I can understand, having been following Groklaw for more years than I
care to remember, the Supreme Court gets to pick and choose which appeals it
wants to consider, so it would seem that they may opt to decline the case. That
would not be ideal, but as the patent wars seem to be rapidly escalating, at
least one case will be heard by the Supremes eventually. It might not be this
one.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 06:04 AM EDT |
The Google bashing scaled up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/technology/widening-
scrutiny-of-googles-smartphone-patents.html?
_r=1&ref=technology
from STEVE LOHR[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 07:44 AM EDT |
Can we put a brief together (a crowd sourced brief)?
If so, then how?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 08:39 AM EDT |
stage_v
from under the bridge[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 11:23 AM EDT |
Even though the idea is old, someone should
be able to get a patent for
the complete software that is
necessary to create a positronic brain or Star
Trek The Next
Generation's Data!
Sure it is a set of algorithms that only
exist in a
virtual environment, but, applying the Mayo decision,
the
outcome is clearly greater than the sum of the whole! [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|