Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 11:22 AM EDT |
Perhaps she doesn't care? Bad tendency IMO. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Bias? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 06:09 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 11:57 AM EDT |
then ruining Samsung's holiday shopping season through procedural interference
would be a great way to do it: by the rules, cleanly, incurably and with little
risk to herself personally, no?
-j[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 08:42 PM EDT |
If she ruled consistently with the rules, why would she get smacked down? If she
simply ignores any extra material that Apple included, which is exactly what she
said that she would do, why would the appeals court smack her down?
You seem to be assuming that she did something wrong without any idea of what it
is that she did wrong. Where did that come from?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|