|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 22 2012 @ 12:02 AM EDT |
"Heinlein's first method of lying believably: tell the truth, but not all
of it."
That's a nice aphorism. It's not particularly useful here though.
Apple argues that the questions were vague and therefore Hogan didn't
necessarily know that he was supposed to mention anything more than he last
lawsuit he was involved in. Nothing in the transcript specifically refutes that.
OTOH, Hogan probably should have figured out, given the questions she asked
about his last lawsuit, that she would have wanted to ask similar questions
about any other lawsuit that she was involved in.
This is one of those situations where people will see what they want to see. If
you believe that he intended to lie, it will look consistent with that. If you
believe he didn't, it will look consistent with that, too.
I do apologize for adding the third point, though. It involved the lawsuit and
that wasn't relevant to the bankruptcy, which was the topic at hand. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|