|
Authored by: dio gratia on Sunday, October 21 2012 @ 12:38 AM EDT |
Already answered
10. Apple also has requested additional
information regarding “whether and when the Quinn partner whose husband filed
the Seagate lawsuit realized this lawsuit involved Velvin Hogan, as well as
whether and when her husband first became aware of this connection.” That Quinn
Emanuel partner, Diane Doolittle, first learned that this lawsuit involved Mr.
Hogan on September 12, 2012, after Samsung and its counsel received the
bankruptcy court file from In re Velvin R. Hogan and Carol K. Hogan, Case No.
93-58291-MM (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 1993), when I informed her of it. Ms.
Doolittle, who was not part of the Samsung trial team in this matter and has not
otherwise worked on this litigation, had not heard of and had no knowledge about
Mr. Hogan prior to that date. Mr. Grady likewise did not know of Mr. Hogan’s
connection to this case until he was informed of the connection on that same
day, September 12, 2012, by Ms. Doolittle.
11. In sum, Samsung and its
counsel discovered that Mr. Hogan had been involved in prior litigation with
Seagate and that he had not fully and truthfully answered questions during voir
dire regarding that litigation only after the jury verdict was announced in this
case. Apple has yet to disclose when it first learned that Mr. Hogan had been a
party to litigation with Seagate.
And I still love the last
sentence.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 21 2012 @ 12:44 AM EDT |
Is that on reruns or something? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|