decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
'additional penalty' | 198 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
'additional penalty'
Authored by: mcinsand on Wednesday, October 24 2012 @ 03:06 PM EDT
A additional monetary would be a must, and the time for the ballot should be
extended by triple the time duration that MS ignored the agreement. To do
anything less would be to reward MS for ignoring the contract that they made.
However, to make this actually have some sting, why not take a lesson from the
UK courts? Perhaps the EU court should have required descriptions under each
browser choice and, under IE, the ballot would be required to say something
like: 'IE, the least secure and most sluggishly patched browser that a user can
choose. IE is only to be used if the user is not worried about having his/her
information stolen and his/her computer taken over by malware.

If we can do that, though...

"Firefox: the browser derived from Netscape, which Microsoft ran out of
business by anticompetitive tying. MS may have been able to run the original
company out of business, but performance and plugins have kept the development
thread going."

"Chrome: a fast browser sponsored by Google, and Google seems to be kicking
Microsoft's behind in the browser market and the search market at the present
time, since Bing is as poor of a search engine as IE is a rotten browser."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )