Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:31 PM EDT |
You failed to note that the link they provided was not the link that PJ pointed
out as not having been listed.
They did provide a link to the judgement.
They did provide a link to the appeal judgement.
They didn't provide a link to the order.
You're a little over-quick on the accusation, and would do well with a bit of
your own advice.
You gonna apologize? I'll bet not...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:32 PM EDT |
PJ's description of Apple's notice is spot on.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jmc on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 02:35 PM EDT |
I don't think PJ is showing bias, the appeal judgment (alas the link is
broken it should be here) says
(paragraph 84):
It is now necessary to make assurance doubly so.
Apple itself must (having created the confusion) make the position clear: that
it acknowledges that the court has decided that these Samsung products do not
infringe its registered design. The acknowledgement must come from the horse's
mouth. Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job
completely.
To my mind the Apple statement does not achieve
that.
Hopefully the court will agree.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 26 2012 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
After having publicly stated things that - at the very least - insinuate
Samsung was breaking the Law, they now have to post a retraction to
that.
Oh... poor poor Apple... Apple's always being picked on by
everyone. *sniff* [mumbling] poor poor Apple....
Caveat: the above
should clearly be viewed as calling Apple out on it's contradictions - such as
where Apple is trying to claim it is being improperly targetted with patent
Lawsuits while it's own Lawsuits are somehow more legitamit for some magical
reason.
*sniff* poor poor Apple... *sniff*
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 02:43 AM EDT |
"acknowledgment" is not the same as "defiance". [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 27 2012 @ 07:53 AM EDT |
two nearly identical posts within the space of a few minutes... [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|