|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 03:11 PM EDT |
Why disappointed?
This situation is identical in behavioral purposes
to the situation where Apple claimed Samsung should have retained evidence from
a date when Apple itself had not.
Samsung has been filing this type right
from the begining... so.... why disappointed before but not now when they're
doing the same?
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Why? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 03:50 PM EDT
- Is it an obviously dropped ball? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT
- Yes - Authored by: webster on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 09:55 PM EDT
- Yes - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 12:00 PM EDT
- Pawn sacrifice? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 08:45 AM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 12:58 AM EDT |
I thought this was rather obvious when I read about it here last month.
my suggestion for samsung.
I would be so stoked if Samsung had read it hear and used it but I can't help
thinking it was kinda obvious.
cheers
Frank[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|