|
Authored by: Tolerance on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 09:26 AM EDT |
Absolutely I was wrong, and rarely have I been so happy
about it!
I
notice the corrected report linked from the main page is
exactly the wording
used in the printed media too. That is
exactly in the terms suggested by the
appeal court judges:
"On 9th July 2012 the High Court of
Justice of England and
Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited's
Galaxy
Tablet Computers, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and
Tab 7.7 do
not infringe Apple's registered design No.
0000181607-0001. A copy of the full
judgment of the High
court is available on the following link [link
given].
That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and
was upheld
by the Court of Appeal on ….. A copy of the Court
of Appeal's judgment is
available on the following link […].
There is no injunction in respect of the
registered design
in force anywhere in
Europe."
--- Grumpy old man [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 03 2012 @ 10:16 AM EDT |
Where is the 'we were not true' statement? The press stuff I've seen looks like
an anonymous hack's end of page stuff. I doubt that's going to satisfy the court
and Apple have had their chance.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Tolerance on Saturday, November 10 2012 @ 04:17 AM EST |
My earlier agreement was premature. It looks as though Apple
have indeed been a cleverboots, by reformatting their home
page so you don't see the link without actively scrolling
down!
Yes, it's bad. Honestly, though, in some ways you just have
to admire them. What's the word? Chutzpah?
---
Grumpy old man[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|