|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 10:51 AM EDT |
But that similarity has been noted by others better placed than I am to comment
on such things.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 11:15 AM EDT |
Just askin'
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 11:37 AM EDT |
If you follow Apple's arguments, Michaelangelo's David wouldn't be
allowed.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: DannyB on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 11:45 AM EDT |
So it would seem that Apple fanboys are okay with Apple telling them what they
can read, what they can see, what they can think, etc.
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 03:43 PM EDT |
>>Of course, Apple fans are cheering Apple's stand against
>>smut
and telling people to use a Samsung 'copy' (yes,
>>they said that) if it
is freedom to indulge their >>immoral urges they want.
Let's get rid of
the unnecessary words:
>>Of course, Apple fans are cheering
Apple's stand against
>>smut and
telling people to use a Samsung 'copy'
(yes,
>>they said that) if it is freedom
to indulge their >>immoral urges they
want.
Now, that sounds more like Apple!
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|