|
Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 09:03 AM EST |
Quote:
Which leaves us with that existential question: what is a page? Is something you
have to scroll to see part of the front page of a website? I can see good and
decent arguments either way on that really.
I have absolutely no idea which way the judges would go on this if it were
referred to them again. And I think I’m right in saying that it would be up to
Samsung to make the complaint about it for them to even consider it. But what’s
your opinion? Necessary and valid redesign of the site or somewhat churlish
defiance of their Lordship’s will?
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Doghouse on Sunday, November 04 2012 @ 11:54 AM EST |
I really hope that Samsung refer this back to the court. I'm not a
lover of Apple at the best of times, but this is the sort of arrant abuse of the
court's patience that no litigant should be allowed to get away with. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|