decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I'd be willing to wager that idea would cut through the "technical difficulties" | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I'd be willing to wager that idea would cut through the "technical difficulties"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 01:11 PM EDT
That wouldn't do it, because the fall guy would already be in jail at that
point. You need a a believeable threat to make that work.

Jail the top guy, then mention that the new top guy will join him unless things
get fixed. Repeat until it works.

I'd bet that you wouldn't need to repeat it more than a couple of times before
it either works, or the whole UK staff of Apple quit to avoid jail time. (The
UK website might be managed from america, so no-one in the UK might have the
power to actually fix it)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Better way to cut through the difficulties
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 04:55 PM EDT
Were I the court, I'd have ordered:

"All right, take as much time as you like. However, for deliberately
subverting the original order, Apple is going to be fined one million pounds an
hour for contempt until it complies, starting from when Apple was supposed to
have the notice originally posted. And no, there will be no stay granted by
this court while you futilely appeal to the Supreme Court of the United
Kingdom." [bang gavel]

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )