|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 08:05 AM EDT |
I can't see why anyone else would publish such a thing, so I don't think there's
any reason to doubt that it's from Apple. But I think the judge might well not
be pleased that it does not identify itself as a statement from "the
horse's mouth".
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: pem on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 09:39 AM EDT |
Even worse, Apple can't claim that they didn't understand the ad had to identify
itself as being from Apple.
They were told the message had to be from the horse's mouth after specifically
asking the court why Samsung couldn't correct the misconception itself...
I suppose they could try to claim they didn't connect those dots, but it would
seem a difficult proposition to claim that you didn't connect the dots while
simultaneously claiming that you're smart enough to be a barrister.
Time to get another bag of popcorn.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: soronlin on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 09:58 AM EDT |
Here's an article with a picture of
the advert.
I can't help thinking Apple is in so much trouble now. To not
identify itself in the advert is as bad or worse than the messing about they did
on the website. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|