decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The printed version | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The printed version
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 05:39 PM EDT
Which in some respects is interesting, because that's meant
someone has deliberately taken a different view on what is
required. Why have they taken that different view? If they
knew it was needed , then doesn't that mean they were wilful
with the web version?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The printed version
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 09:47 PM EDT
I'm not sure of the time frames here.

How long in advance would it be necessary to submit the text to the Financial
Times?

Does that time frame predate the publication on the website or Samsung's
objection or the order subsequently issued by the court?

It seems to me that Apple likely anticipated the courts displeasure and
published a plain version in the print media but assumed that the electronic
version on Apple's website would be unnoticed by the troglodyte English courts.

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )