Note: I do not expect the evidence from Tim. I expect it from those making
the claims against Google!
Personally: I'd like to see their evidence
beyond the heresay they are presenting.
When the FTC does initiate
something against Google, then I'll consider the "future predictions" to maybe
have been more then wishful thinking.
For example:
Google had
been trying to use their FRAND patents, gained by purchasing Motorola, to try
and block imports by Microsoft and Apple into USA.
If true - all
they have to do is point to the appropriate Lawsuits where that is ocurring.
Where:
A: Motorola initiated such action after Google took over
ownership!
B: The action truly was initiated by Motorola, not as a
respose to action initiated by a third party (such as Apple)!
C: Where
the other party involved has not initiated such harmful requests themselves in
which Motorola isn't simply responding to defend themselves!
After all: If
Google really has done as claimed, there should be some Lawsuit that can be
pointed to as evidence.... right?
And if no Lawsuit can be pointed to:
then the evidence of the claim doesn't exist and therefore the claim is
deliberately false!
Bloomberg: If you don't wish to provide evidence to
back the claim then you should ask yourself why you're so very willing to print
FUD!!!
Main Media: You really want to know why a lot of us don't trust
you? Look at your willingness to present FUD without any kind of evidence
backing it just so you can make a little more profit!!!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|