|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:14 PM EST |
When you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. When you have the law on
your side, argue the law. When you have neither, holler.
So clearly the action to take here, in option number three.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Talk lots, just be careful not to say anything. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:16 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: darrellb on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 06:56 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 12:38 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 10:53 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 11:33 AM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 02:38 PM EST |
Unfortunately, fighting to not give one is just as damning, if not more so -
sins of omission are just as bad (if not worse) than sins of commission.
By fighting instead of replying, they clearly have something to hide, in which
case prior examples of their actions will have to be used: instant thought is
getting Samsung sanctioned for not keeping evidence when they were not keeping
the same [kind of] evidence for much longer, ie loudly declaiming against
Samsung when they were more guilty.
In this case, they have loudly said Samsung should have acted earlier which to
me says they had the ability to act even earlier but didn't. ie it is highly
probable that Apple knew/realised the link /BEFORE/ Samsung.
If Apple would like to prove me wrong by answering the question under oath, I am
ready to be corrected; however, until they do, that is what I will have to
believe.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Counterpoint - Authored by: JonCB on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 05:47 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 10:21 PM EST
|
|
|
|