Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 11:24 AM EST |
What is so interesting is the role that
a lawsuit played. Because one man sued
over Ohio's last-minute "adjustment" to
the machines, I believe it made it
impossible to cheat in a widespread way
without getting caught. The judge
ruled that he wouldn't stop the voting,
but if there was evidence of cheating,
he'd look into it afterward.
That, I think, may have made a big difference,
if one suspects that there was a hope to
win through cheating. Not saying there was,
but one can't help but notice that the family
of one of the candidates had an ownership
interest. So just saying.
The law is powerful, and that's why it's so
important to keep politics out of it to
the degree possible, so that judges are
not beholden to any party or any money.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 12:56 PM EST |
Welcome to the Plutoarchy of the The People's Socialist Democratic Republic of
the United States of America.
FWIW, back in 1973, SCUSA ruled that the United States was de juro a
dictatorship, that elected its dictator every four years. This was a follow up
to a 1967 SCUSA decision that the president of the United States had could
implement laws, statutes, rules, regulations, policy, directives, orders, and
requirements on any issue, without requiring, accepting, or even acknowledging
input by any other agency --- including the courts. The President was above any
interference by any body, for carrying out such laws, statutes, rules,
regulations, policy, directives, orders, or requirements, that the President
thinks are best for the country.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|