|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 12:49 PM EST |
It has been noted before the Samsung motion is a head-I-win tail-you-lose kind
of thing.
If Apple say they did not know till after the verdict, then Samsung can use that
to say, Apple did not investigate the jurors, to be equitable why should we have
been required to do so.
Jane {not signed in}[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Apple Refuses to Answer Samsung's Q Re When It Learned About the Foreman's Seagate Litigation ~pj - Authored by: stegu on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 12:58 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Doghouse on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:06 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:14 PM EST
- Talk lots, just be careful not to say anything. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:16 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: darrellb on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 06:56 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 12:38 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 10:53 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 11:33 AM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 02:38 PM EST
- Counterpoint - Authored by: JonCB on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 05:47 PM EST
- Exactly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 10:21 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 01:14 PM EST |
Check out what they do say:
Samsung does not dispute that
Apple is relying on Samsung’s knowledge, not Apple’s.
Hang on a
minute - did Apple ever *claim* that it was relying on Samsung's knowledge? If
that claim was not made, then how would it be Samsung's duty to dispute it? If
that claim is being made, "attorney work product" is irrelevant. Just come out
and say, "We learned about this on October XX when Samsung told us about it",
and the whole controversy disappears. This is why Apple's stance just
doesn't add up - they take positions which are different from those which would
be sensible positions to take if they were being honest. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|